Sunday, November 11, 2007

If Cars were treated like Guns

Found on a mailing list:

  • Convicted felons could not own or drive a car.
  • You'd pay for a car, register it, and then wait from 5 to 15 days to pick up your car.
  • Purchasing a used car from a neighbor requires the same waiting period, and you would have to transact the sale through a licensed car dealer.
  • If you trade in your old car for a newer model, you still have to wait 5 to 15 days to pick the new one up.
  • You could buy a car and register it, but you'd need a special permit to take it on the streets.
  • To get the above "street permit" you have to show good cause, and be of good moral character (as defined by the licensing authority).
  • Persons convicted of "domestic violence" could not own or drive a car, even if that conviction occurred 30 years ago.
  • Your car would have to be stored where no child could access it and hurt themselves playing with it.
  • In some places (e.g. NYC or New Jersey) you would first need a permit from the police department to buy a car, which sometimes takes up to 2 years to obtain.
  • If you buy a car, and then move to another state, you may have to leave the car behind since the other state may not accept the make and model you own.
  • If a minor child stole your car and hurt himself or others with it, you'd be guilty of a felony.
  • In some cities (e.g. Washington D.C.) you would have to store your car partially disassembled.
  • Failure to register your car would be a federal felony (prevents you from ever owning another one, for the rest of your life).
  • People under psychiatric care, or declared to be mentally incompetent, could not own or drive a car.
  • Some models of automobiles might be banned after you buy them, and you'd have to turn them over to the government without compensation.
  • "Assault vehicles" look evil and must be specially registered at extra cost. Hummers, 4x4 trucks, Suburbans, Dodge Vipers, Nissan NSX's, and Corvettes are likely targets.
  • Cars under a certain size, or having certain features, could not be imported.
  • You could not modify your car to allow more fuel, more performance, or better cornering.
  • The government would allow some states or cities to not issue licenses at all, for any reason (or no reason at all).
  • Cars could not be operated on city streets with gasoline in the tank. (Kinda defeats the whole purpose, doesn't it?)
  • In some states (e.g. Virginia, California) you could only buy one car per month.
  • There would be no traffic "infractions". Instead, all violations would be criminal misdemeanors or felonies.
  • It would be illegal to directly buy a car from an out of state dealer or seller.
  • Car dealers would have to allow government agents to review their records without a warrant and without notice.
  • Car dealers who sell a car to someone prohibited would be charged with a federal felony.
  • Car dealers would be subject to being shut down by the government, and charged with a felony, for failure to keep proper records. The government inspector defines what "proper records" means.
  • The inventory of car dealers could be seized and destroyed before the dealer is ever charged in court.
  • Your car could be declared to be one of the banned kind, even after you legally bought it, and you would be charged as a criminal, based solely on the word of a government auto inspector, who doesn't even have any written guidelines to what is required for a car to be banned.

4 comments:

Connor N. Roberts said...

That would actually help the cities if more people weren't allowed to own cars because they'd be forced to take the bus, helps keep the air cleaner with less pollution being spewed in the air, etc.

And for those of them who, for some reason, couldn't afford to take the bus then they've still got left foot and right foot so start walkin'.

Hey, if the bus or else walking is good enough for a cripple like me with a 30% to 40% functional heart, then it's damn well good enough for them.

Unknown said...

Actually, the facts are that busses do not keep the air cleaner, do not help with congestion, and do not improve the cities in any way. That's all just bull that you've been fed by the anti-car lobbies in order to make you believe that anyone who owns a car is selfish, etc.

Connor N. Roberts said...

Not even the new buses that are supposed to be better for the environment supposedly? Ya'know, the ones that are making the price of my disabled bus pass jump up more and more to pay for those new and supposedly better buses?

Unknown said...

Yup. Just think of how many busses you see driving around empty, or nearly empty. They're using just as much fuel as they would when full of passengers. Plus, they're taking up the traffic space of 3 or 4 small cars, without providing the independence and ability to control your destination that a small car provides. Even a Scapegoat Utility Vehicle is a better deal than a bus.